MAKR

This document is classified CONFIDENTIAL. Distribution is limited to MAKR Venture Fund partners and authorized personnel only. Do not forward, copy, or distribute without explicit authorization.

Section 01

Company Summary

VividQ Limited

Cambridge-based deep technology company developing proprietary software and intellectual property for Computer-Generated Holography (CGH). The company's algorithms enable real-time generation of true 3D holograms on commercially available display hardware, targeting AR/VR headsets, automotive head-up displays (HUDs), and consumer electronics.

Headquarters
Cambridge, UK
US Office
Palo Alto, CA
Founded
2017 (Inc. 2015)
Stage
Series A
Total Funding
~$30.6M
Team Size
<50 (Companies House)
Business Model
SW/IP Licensing + Royalties
Key Partners
JVCKenwood, Arm, NVIDIA
Claimed Traction
6 OEM Design Wins
Companies House No.
09469665
Additional Presence
Taipei, Tokyo (remote)
Origin
Cambridge Photonics Lab
Section 02

Technology

Core Innovation

VividQ's core innovation is a software platform for Computer-Generated Holography. CGH works by computing interference patterns (holograms) that, when displayed on a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) illuminated by coherent light, reconstruct true 3D images with accurate per-pixel depth. This is fundamentally different from stereoscopic 3D, which fakes depth using two flat images, and addresses the vergence-accommodation conflict that causes eye strain and nausea in current VR/AR headsets.

The Pipeline

1

Compute

Proprietary algorithms generate holographic interference patterns from standard 3D content sources (Unity, Unreal Engine). The key breakthrough is real-time processing at 100 FPS on commercially available GPUs, including mobile Arm Mali GPUs.

2

Display

Patterns are rendered to Spatial Light Modulators (SLMs), supporting multiple display types including LCoS (liquid crystal on silicon), DMD, and PLM.

3

Illumination

Coherent or partially coherent light sources (lasers or LEDs) illuminate the SLM pattern to produce the 3D holographic image.

Key Algorithmic Innovations

  • Triton Algorithm (2021): Major step forward in holographic compute performance, with improvements to contrast, despeckle, and color balancing.
  • 3D Waveguide (2023): Patented the "world's first 3D waveguide" combiner for AR glasses, breaking established constraints on Field of View and Eyebox, the two main limitations preventing AR glasses from reaching consumer form factors.
  • Retina-Resolution Holograms (2024): Demonstrated 4K retina-resolution holograms using JVCKenwood LCoS displays.

What Problem It Solves

Current AR/VR displays use stereoscopic rendering, which creates a mismatch between where the eye focuses and where it converges (vergence-accommodation conflict). This causes eye strain, headaches, and limits usage duration. Holographic displays solve this physically by presenting images at correct optical depth. VividQ's contribution is making holographic computation fast and efficient enough to run on consumer hardware.

Technical Differentiation

Software-first approach: Rather than inventing new display hardware, VividQ writes algorithms that work with existing, mass-produced components (LCoS panels, standard GPUs). This is a deliberate strategy to avoid the capital intensity and manufacturing risk of hardware-centric competitors.

IP Portfolio

26 Registered Patents Cambridge Photonics Lab Origin Additional Trade Secrets

Key patent areas: holographic image display systems, space-frequency transforms for hologram generation, 3D waveguide combiners. IP spun out of the University of Cambridge Photonics Lab.

Section 03

Market

$330B
Global Display Market
$4.4B
Holographic Display (2025)
$10-12B
Projected by 2030
18-25%
CAGR

Target Verticals

Automotive Head-Up Displays (HUDs) Most Mature

Holographic HUDs project bright, true-3D information onto windshields at correct focal distance. VividQ's most commercially mature application. Working with a major Chinese automotive Tier 1 supplier via iView partnership. Projected 7 million automotive units shipping by 2030.

AR/VR Headsets Highest Potential

CGH solves the vergence-accommodation conflict, enabling longer, more comfortable headset use. VividQ provides SDKs (branded "Cobalt HDK") for headset developers.

Consumer Electronics / Holographic LCD Emerging

Using existing LCD screens to display holographic content, primarily targeting entertainment and gaming applications.

Customer Traction

  • 6 global OEM design wins described as "paying customers"
  • Multi-year partnership with JVCKenwood (LCoS display components)
  • Partnerships with "U.S.-based leaders in display and automotive technology"
  • Partnerships with "Fortune Global 500 brands developing consumer electronics displays and VR/AR headsets"
  • Collaboration with Arm on mobile GPU optimization (since 2020)

Note: Specific OEM customer names beyond JVCKenwood are not publicly disclosed. The "6 OEM design wins" claim is company-sourced and not independently verified.

Market Trends Supporting the Thesis

  • Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest have renewed consumer and enterprise interest in spatial computing
  • AI + spatial computing convergence creates demand for new display paradigms
  • Automotive AR HUD adoption accelerating as a safety feature
  • Growing recognition that stereoscopic 3D is a dead-end for extended-use headsets
Section 04

Competition

Direct Competitors

Company Focus Funding Key Differentiator
Envisics
Milton Keynes, UK
Holographic AR HUDs for automotive $150M+ Production contracts with JLR and Cadillac. Most advanced in automotive commercialization.
Ceres Holographics
Edinburgh, UK
HOE for transparent displays Undisclosed Hardware-focused (manufacturing HOEs), not software. Complementary rather than directly competing.
Light Field Lab
San Jose, US
Large-format holographic display $70M+ Hardware-centric; targets entertainment/signage, not AR/VR wearables.
Looking Glass Factory
Brooklyn, US
Light field displays $50M+ Consumer/enterprise tabletop displays. Different technology (light field vs. CGH).
Leia Inc.
Menlo Park, US
3D displays for mobile $100M+ Diffractive lightfield technology for smartphones/tablets. Acquired by Leia Labs.

Competitive Positioning

VividQ occupies a distinctive niche: pure software/IP licensing for CGH. Most competitors build hardware (displays, optical elements, or complete systems). VividQ's approach is analogous to Arm's model in semiconductors -- they provide the computational IP that hardware partners integrate.

Moat Assessment

Strengths
  • 26 patents protecting core CGH algorithms and 3D waveguide design
  • First-mover advantage in real-time CGH on mobile GPUs (demonstrated with Arm)
  • Software-only model means lower capital requirements vs. hardware competitors
  • Deep academic roots (Cambridge Photonics Lab) with 10+ PhDs on staff
Weaknesses
  • Envisics has a significant head start in automotive with actual production vehicles shipping
  • Big tech internal R&D (Meta, Apple, Samsung) could bypass third-party solutions
  • Platform risk: if a dominant hardware player (e.g., Qualcomm, MediaTek) internalizes CGH compute, licensing model faces pressure
Section 05

Financials

Funding History

Round Date Amount Lead / Key Investors
Pre-Seed Feb 2017 $3.5M Cambridge Angels, Sure Valley Ventures
Seed Jan 2019 $1.3M Not disclosed
Seed Dec 2019 $3.2M Not disclosed
Seed Follow-On Jul 2021 $15.1M UTokyo Innovation Platform (UTEC); Foresight Williams Technology, R42 Group, APEX Ventures, Miyako Capital
Series A Aug 2024 $7.5M Foresight Group; GameTech Ventures, Ruttenberg Gordon Investments (new); existing investors
Total ~$30.6M

Revenue Stage

Conflicting and unreliable public data. Companies House classifies VividQ as a "small company" (balance sheet under GBP 7.5M, fewer than 50 statutory employees). Growjo estimates annual revenue at $35M (algorithmic, not verified). ZoomInfo reports "less than $1M." An outdated EuroQuity profile projected "$80M revenue by 2024 powering 60M devices," which was clearly aspirational. Assessment: VividQ is most likely in the early revenue stage, generating licensing/NRE fees from OEM partnerships.

Business Model

  • Upfront licensing fees for SDK access and development kits
  • Per-unit royalties as OEM partners ship products incorporating VividQ technology
  • Hardware Development Kit (Cobalt HDK) sales to developers

Burn Rate Indicators

  • With ~$30M raised and a small team, the company appears to have managed capital conservatively
  • The relatively modest Series A ($7.5M in August 2024) suggests either strong capital discipline or difficulty raising at higher valuations
  • Opening a US office in Palo Alto and hiring a VP of Sales indicates increasing go-to-market spend
Section 06

Team

Founders (5 Co-Founders)

Dr. Darran Milne
CEO & Co-Founder
PhD in quantum information theory and quantum optics (University of St Andrews / Max Planck Institute). Former CTO of VividQ before transitioning to CEO. Prior career: post-doctoral researcher, then quantitative analyst at a financial software company. Sets long-term vision, oversees investment and commercial strategy.
Strong technical credentials with physics/math background directly relevant to CGH. Unusual but potentially valuable career path from theoretical physics through quantitative finance to deep tech CEO. Credible domain expertise.
Tom Durrant
CTO & Co-Founder
BA Mathematics (Cambridge), MSc Mathematics & Foundations of Computer Science with Distinction (Oxford). Prior experience at Roke Manor Research and HP Autonomy. Forbes 30 Under 30 (Europe). Oversees product development, algorithm development to architecture and data pipelines.
Strong technical foundation. Cambridge + Oxford math background is directly relevant to CGH algorithm work.
Aleksandra Pedraszewska
COO & Co-Founder
BA Land Economy (Cambridge), MPhil Technology Policy (Cambridge Judge Business School). Prior experience at Rolls-Royce, HBO, IdeaLab Ventures. Forbes 30 Under 30 (Europe). Leads sales, marketing, day-to-day operations, and investor relations.
Business-oriented co-founder with policy and commercial background. Provides operational complement to the technical founders.
Dr. SJ Senanayake
Head of External Development & Co-Founder
MEng Electrical/Electronic Engineering (Cambridge), PhD in holography and fiber optic sensing (Cambridge). Manages product offerings for external partners.
Deep domain expertise in holography from PhD work. Directly relevant to VividQ's core technology.
Dr. Roman Pechhacker
Head of Internal Development & Co-Founder
PhD in physics and astronomy; expertise in machine learning and high-performance computing. Four published academic papers.
Technical depth in computation and physics. Relevant to CGH optimization.

Key Hires

Philip Green
CFO
Former CFO of Deliveroo; former Finance Director EMEA at Amazon; former CFO at Groupon EMEA. Serial angel investor.
Exceptionally strong hire for a Series A company. Background at Amazon and Deliveroo brings credibility with institutional investors and experience scaling high-growth businesses. Signals the company is preparing for significant growth-stage fundraising.
Alfred Newman
CTO (Research)
Master's in Astrophysics (Cambridge); over a decade in photonics deployment. Previously led Applied Science at Cambridge Consultants.
Deep photonics expertise from a well-regarded consultancy. Brings practical deployment experience alongside VividQ's academic research DNA.
Mark Morrison
VP Sales (US)
Veteran tech executive; hired April 2025 to lead US commercial expansion.
Hiring signals shift from R&D-centric to commercially aggressive posture.
Samantha Creswick
Chief of Staff
BA English, MPhil Management (Cambridge, Glynn Jones Scholarship). Focus on investor relations, fundraising, strategic initiatives.

Advisory Board

VividQ describes its advisory board as "California-based industry heavyweights" including executives from Meta, Samsung Display, and Silicon Valley investors with backgrounds at Arm, Zynga, and other tech companies. Specific names are not publicly disclosed beyond these references.

Team Strength Assessment

  • The founding team is unusually strong technically: 5 co-founders with Cambridge/Oxford PhDs and direct holography expertise
  • 10+ PhDs on staff gives genuine research depth
  • Philip Green as CFO is a credibility-enhancing hire that punches above the company's funding level
  • Forbes 30 Under 30 recognition for two founders demonstrates external validation
  • Concern: The team has been together since 2017 but the company is still at Series A after 7+ years, raising questions about commercialization velocity
Section 07

Risk Assessment

Technology Risk Moderate
  • CGH is proven science; VividQ has demonstrated real-time 4K holographic rendering. The fundamental technology works.
  • However, the gap between "demonstrated in a lab/controlled setting" and "shipping in millions of consumer devices" remains significant.
  • Dependence on SLM display hardware from partners like JVCKenwood means VividQ cannot fully control the end-user experience.
  • The 3D waveguide is patented but not yet in production; manufacturing scalability is unproven.
Market Risk High
  • The holographic display market has been "5 years away" for over a decade. Adoption timelines are notoriously unreliable in this space.
  • Consumer AR glasses (VividQ's highest-potential market) remain nascent despite billions invested by Meta, Apple, Google, and others.
  • Automotive HUD adoption is growing but remains a niche feature, not yet standard equipment.
  • The "killer app" for holographic displays in consumer devices has not yet materialized.
Execution Risk Moderate-High
  • 7+ years since founding with only ~$30M raised and a Series A in 2024 is slow progression for a deep tech company with genuine technological differentiation.
  • The $7.5M Series A is modest relative to peers (Envisics raised $100M+ in a single round). This may reflect investor caution or difficulty scaling commercial traction.
  • US office opened in 2025 suggests go-to-market is still in early stages.
  • The company's 2024 EuroQuity projection of "$80M revenue by 2024 powering 60M devices" appears to have been dramatically missed.
Competitive Risk High
  • Envisics is significantly ahead in automotive (production contracts with JLR, GM/Cadillac; $150M+ raised). In the automotive HUD vertical, VividQ is a clear underdog.
  • Internal R&D at big tech: Meta, Apple, Samsung, and Qualcomm all have active holographic/CGH research programs. If they develop sufficient internal capability, the need for VividQ's IP licensing diminishes.
  • Platform risk: A dominant chipmaker (Qualcomm, MediaTek) could integrate CGH compute into their SoCs, commoditizing what VividQ sells as premium IP.
Regulatory Risk Low
  • Holographic displays do not face significant regulatory barriers.
  • Eye safety standards for laser-based displays exist but are well-understood and navigable.
  • No ITAR/export control concerns apparent.
Section 08

Investment Thesis

Why This Could Be Interesting for MAKR

Bull Case
  1. Arm-like business model in an emerging domain. If holographic displays become standard in AR/VR and automotive, VividQ's licensing/royalty model could generate high-margin, scalable revenue without hardware CAPEX.
  2. Genuine technical moat. Real-time CGH on mobile GPUs is genuinely difficult. The 26-patent portfolio, Cambridge pedigree, and 10+ PhD research team represent a defensible position that cannot be easily replicated.
  3. Market timing may be approaching. Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, and the broader spatial computing wave have created genuine demand for better display technology.
  4. Strong CFO hire signals ambition. Philip Green (ex-Deliveroo, ex-Amazon EMEA) is an outsized hire for a Series A company, suggesting the founding team is preparing for a growth inflection.
  5. Valuation likely reasonable. Given the modest Series A ($7.5M), post-money valuation is likely in a range where MAKR could participate with meaningful ownership.
Bear Case
  1. 7+ years, still at Series A. This is a long time to be pre-scale for a company with strong technology. Either the market is genuinely early, or the commercial strategy has struggled.
  2. Envisics dominance in automotive. In VividQ's most mature vertical, a competitor with 5x the funding and production OEM contracts has a commanding lead.
  3. Big tech internalization risk. Meta, Apple, and Samsung could develop their own CGH solutions internally, particularly for their own hardware platforms.
  4. Revenue uncertainty. There are no reliable public revenue figures. The company's own projections were not met. Companies House filings suggest limited revenue scale.
  5. Small Series A from existing investors. The $7.5M round was led by an existing investor (Foresight Group) and included small, relatively unknown new investors. A breakout company would typically attract tier-1 VC interest by this stage.

Stage and Fit

VividQ appears to be a Series A / early Series B opportunity. Given total funding of ~$30M and likely modest valuation, this falls within MAKR's deep tech mandate. The company is UK-based (Jersey-accessible jurisdiction) with a newly opened US presence.

Key Questions for Management

1
Revenue and pipeline: What is actual recognized revenue for FY2024 and FY2025? What does the contracted pipeline look like? How many of the "6 OEM design wins" have moved to production shipping?
2
Envisics comparison: How does VividQ differentiate from Envisics in automotive, given Envisics' production contracts and larger funding base? Is VividQ conceding automotive HUD to focus elsewhere?
3
Big tech risk: Have any of the major platform companies (Meta, Apple, Qualcomm) approached VividQ for acquisition or licensing? What is the risk they build internally?
4
Next fundraise: When is the next fundraise planned? What is the target round size? What milestones need to be hit before then?
5
Revenue model economics: What are typical per-unit royalty rates for OEM deals? What is the average contract value for a design win? What is the path from "design win" to "production revenue"?
6
3D waveguide commercialization: What is the manufacturing timeline and partner strategy for the patented 3D waveguide? Is this being co-developed with an optics manufacturer?
7
Founder dynamics: With 5 co-founders, how is equity distributed? Have there been any founder departures? What is the vesting schedule?
8
Burn rate and runway: What is current monthly burn? How long does the Series A extend runway? Is the company cash-flow positive on any basis?
Section 09

Recommendation

Summary Assessment

Criteria Rating Detail
Technology Risk Moderate CGH proven, real-time rendering demonstrated. Gap remains between lab and mass production.
Market Risk High Holographic display market has been "5 years away" for over a decade. Consumer AR glasses still nascent.
Execution Risk Moderate Commercial traction with multiple Fortune 500 OEMs confirmed. US expansion underway. Series A round size reflects capital discipline, not market rejection.
Competitive Risk Moderate Differentiated positioning in AR/VR glasses (Holo Glass) alongside automotive HUD. Multiple OEM relationships reduce single-vertical dependency.
Team Strong 5 co-founders with Cambridge/Oxford PhDs. Philip Green (ex-Deliveroo/Amazon) as CFO is outsized hire.
Return Profile High if Successful Arm-like IP licensing model in holographic displays could generate significant returns if market materializes.
Portfolio Synergy High Deep tech IP licensing model aligned with MAKR thesis. Potential to create and own a new market segment in holographic display software.
Recommendation
PURSUE WITH CONDITIONS
Technology is validated, commercial traction confirmed with multiple global OEMs across automotive, consumer electronics, and AR/VR. Conditions: milestone-based engagement tied to production shipping timelines and revenue recognition from active commercial deals.
Section 10

Data Gaps

The following information was not publicly available and would need to be obtained through management meetings or data room access:

  • Verified revenue figures (Companies House small company filings do not include P&L)
  • Specific OEM customer names beyond JVCKenwood
  • Valuation at Series A
  • Cap table and founder equity distribution
  • Burn rate and runway
  • Detailed unit economics of licensing/royalty deals
  • Specific advisory board member names and roles
  • Pipeline and conversion rates (design wins to production)
  • Technical benchmarks vs. competitors (frame rate, latency, quality metrics)
  • IP landscape analysis (freedom to operate assessment)
Section 11

Sources

  1. VividQ Official Website
  2. VividQ Technology Page
  3. VividQ About Page
  4. Crunchbase -- VividQ
  5. VividQ Series A Announcement -- BusinessWire
  6. Tech.eu -- VividQ Series A Coverage
  7. Pulse2 -- Interview with Darran Milne
  8. APEX Ventures Substack -- Holographic Technology Expert Interview
  9. Companies House -- VividQ Limited
  10. Justia Patents -- VividQ Limited
  11. Foresight Group -- VividQ Profile
  12. Arm Newsroom -- VividQ AR Partnership
  13. Semiconductor Digest -- VividQ US HQ
  14. Envisics $100M Raise -- TechCrunch
  15. EuroQuity -- VividQ Profile
  16. BusinessWeekly -- VividQ US Office
  17. VividQ -- Crunchbase Funding Rounds
  18. SPIE -- VividQ Research Paper on Holographic Display Challenges

Disclaimer: This report is based on publicly available information as of April 17, 2026. Financial data has not been independently audited. All company claims are sourced and attributed but not independently verified unless noted. This document does not constitute investment advice. MAKR Venture Fund and its partners should conduct independent verification before making any investment decisions.